New York’s Mayoral Election Is a Test of Our Civic Integrity

By Sheikh Musa Drammeh

New York City voters are heading into one of the most layered and consequential mayoral elections in recent memory. The stakes are high—not simply because of who’s on the ballot, but because of what this election reveals about our civic values and political maturity.

Representing the Democratic Party is Zohran Mamdani—a young, Muslim, immigrant, and democratic socialist who recently became a U.S. citizen. Though currently serving in the State Assembly, his legislative record is still developing. His candidacy, nevertheless, introduces a stark contrast to the city’s political establishment—particularly regarding his position on U.S.-Israel relations and his alignment with the Democratic Socialists of America. His presence in the race challenges us to grapple with bold policy proposals rather than personal identifiers.

Casting him aside based on his religion, ethnicity, or length of citizenship would not only be dishonest—it would betray the values New York claims to hold. A city that prides itself on diversity cannot, with integrity, marginalize someone for embodying it. Choosing to fixate on Mamdani’s identity instead of his platform would reduce our politics to exclusionary spectacle.

Elsewhere on the ballot, two high-profile independents—Mayor Eric Adams and former Governor Andrew Cuomo—are running despite recent legal controversies. Though neither was convicted, their past indictments remain a source of debate. Still, dismissing them outright ignores a broader truth: political accountability cannot exist without a fair measure of context and nuance. Their records in public office, along with their current proposals, deserve close scrutiny—not casual condemnation.

Another contender, Jim Walden of the Independence Party, has cultivated a reputation for principled leadership. His campaign, however, has struggled to gain momentum within New York’s polarized political culture. His difficulties highlight the persistent barriers facing those who operate outside traditional party lines, regardless of competence or credibility.

Curtis Sliwa, running unopposed on the Republican line, enters the race with name recognition and a loyal base. Yet in a city where Republican voters are vastly outnumbered, his chances of prevailing remain remote.

What binds these disparate candidates is not just their desire to lead—but how they will be judged by the electorate. If we allow fear, prejudice, or party loyalty to guide our decision-making, we do ourselves a disservice. If, however, we approach this election with a focus on qualifications, ideas, and integrity, we affirm the core principles of democracy.

The real opportunity here isn’t just to choose a mayor—it’s to demonstrate who we are as voters. How we handle this moment will reflect what we value more: identity politics or inclusive governance, surface narratives or substantive leadership.

Let’s vote with discernment. Let’s rise above reflex and rhetoric. In doing so, we not only shape the future of our city—we reaffirm its soul.

Sheikh Musa Drammeh is a New York voter and community advocate.